Decoding the Doodle: AI Lends a Hand in Art Therapy’s House-Tree-Person Test

The Teacher Who Planted Herself by Mechelle Gilford and Sir Bard circa 2024

Decoding the Doodle: AI Lends a Hand in Art Therapy’s House-Tree-Person Test

Art therapy, a therapeutic approach harnessing the power of creative expression, has long relied on projective tests like the House-Tree-Person (HTP) to delve into the depths of the human psyche. Developed in 1948 by John Buck, this test invites individuals to draw a house, a tree, and a person, with each element symbolizing different aspects of their inner world. For instance, a house with open windows might suggest openness and accessibility, while a bare tree could indicate feelings of emptiness or loss. Details like the size of the person’s head or the presence of hands can reveal insights into self-esteem, anxieties, and social relationships.

Traditionally, art therapists have relied on their clinical expertise and interpretive guidelines to decode these symbolic representations. However, the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) is ushering in a new era for HTP assessment. AI algorithms, in-training on vast datasets of HTP drawings, can now identify subtle patterns and nuances that may elude even the most seasoned therapist. This technology opens up exciting possibilities for enhancing the depth and accuracy of interpretations, potentially uncovering hidden emotions and facilitating more targeted therapeutic interventions.

Analog vs. Digital: A Comparative Analysis

Traditionally, the HTP test has been administered using pen and paper, with therapists relying on their subjective interpretations of the drawings. While this approach offers a personal touch and allows for real-time interaction between therapist and client, it also has limitations. Human interpretations can be influenced by biases and varying levels of expertise.

AI-powered HTP assessment, on the other hand, leverages digital tools, such as tablets or drawing software, to capture the artwork. AI algorithms then analyze the drawings, identifying patterns, symbolism, and subtle details that might not be readily apparent to the human eye. This can provide a more objective and comprehensive analysis, potentially uncovering hidden emotions and revealing patterns that might otherwise be overlooked.

Benefits and Considerations for Art Therapists and Clients

The integration of AI in HTP assessment offers several benefits for both art therapists and their clients:

1. Enhanced Interpretation: AI can offer additional insights and perspectives, helping therapists to understand their clients’ drawings more deeply and comprehensively.
2. Increased Objectivity: By reducing the reliance on subjective interpretation, AI can help mitigate biases and ensure a more objective analysis of the artwork.
3. Greater Accessibility: AI-powered tools can make HTP assessment more accessible to individuals who may have difficulty with traditional drawing methods, such as those with physical disabilities or motor impairments.
4. Longitudinal Analysis: AI can track changes in HTP drawings over time, providing valuable insights into therapeutic progress and helping therapists tailor interventions more effectively.

With that, it’s crucial to note that AI should not replace the expertise of the art therapist. Rather, it should be seen as tool to augment their skills and understanding.

The Future of HTP and AI: A Collaborative Approach

The integration of AI in art therapy is still in its early stages, but the potential is undeniable. By combining the human touch of art therapy with the analytical power of AI, we can unlock new depths of understanding and create more effective therapeutic interventions. As this field continues to evolve, we can expect to see AI playing an increasingly important role in helping art therapists and their clients navigate the intricate landscapes of the human psyche.

—

References

• Buck, J. N. (1948). The HTP Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4(4), 317–396.
• Gantt, L. & Tabone, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Care: Clinical Applications and Ethical Considerations. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 37(1), 1-14.
• Hammer, E. F. (Ed.). (1958). The clinical application of projective drawings.
• Hammond, K. R. (1944). The Human Element in the HTP Test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 79-81.
• Langer, M., & Beckman, C. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Art Therapy: A Qualitative Study. Journal of the American Art Therapy Association.Charles C Thomas Publisher.
• Liang, P., & Fu, X. (2020). A Deep Learning Approach to Psychological Assessment Based on the House-Tree-Person Test. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 3573-3580). IEEE.
• Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation. Charles C Thomas Publisher.
• Malchiodi, C. A. (2012). Handbook of Art Therapy. Guilford Press.